Tahapan dan Langkah-Langkah Penerapan Mixed Method Research (MMR) dalam Penelitian Pendidikan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62048/qjms.v2i1.55Keywords:
Mixed Method Research, Sequential Explanatory, Sequential Exploratory, Concurrent Triangulation, Concurrent EmbeddedAbstract
Many academics believe that using questionnaires and interviews simultaneously, or combining statistical analysis and narrative interpretation, can be categorized as mixed method research (MMR). This view is not entirely correct, but it is not entirely wrong either. MMR involves integrating quantitative and qualitative methods in a study, including all related components. However, not all simultaneous uses of quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis techniques can be considered MMR, as several key factors, such as timing, weighting, and research objectives, must be taken into account. This article aims to elaborate on various MMR models and their implementation steps, using a literature review method. The study identifies six MMR models: Sequential Explanatory, Sequential Exploratory, Concurrent Triangulation, Concurrent Embedded, Sequential Transformative, and Concurrent Transformative. However, the last two models are not discussed in detail due to their lower popularity. The Sequential Explanatory model integrates quantitative and qualitative methods sequentially, with greater emphasis on quantitative methods to provide additional information. Similarly, the Sequential Exploratory model is conducted sequentially but places more weight on qualitative data to connect findings. The Concurrent Triangulation model integrates both methods simultaneously, with equal weighting to compare data, while the Concurrent Embedded model combines the methods simultaneously but prioritizes one as the primary method and the other as the secondary method, aiming to compare data. Our findings provide practical guidelines for researchers in implementing each MMR model, particularly by highlighting aspects that are often overlooked in previous literature. These guidelines are expected to help researchers select and apply models that align with their research needs.
References
Alavi, H., & Habek, P. (2016). Addressing research design problem in mixed methods research. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 21(1), 62–66. https://doi.org/10.2478/mspe-10-01-2016
Almeida, F. (2018). Strategies to perform a mixed methods study. European Journal of Education Studies, 5(1), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.46827/EJES.V0I0.1902
Bazrafshan, A., Haghdoost, A., Rezaie, H., & Beigzadeh, A. (2015). A practical framework for evaluating health services management educational program: The application of the mixed-method sequential explanatory design. Research and Development in Medical Education, 4(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.15171/rdme.2015.008
Bentahar, O., & Cameron, R. (2015). Design and implementation of a mixed method research study in project management. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 13(1), 3–15.
Bowen, P. W., Rose, R., & Pilkington, A. (2017). Mixed methods-theory and practice. Sequential, explanatory approach. International Journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods, 5(2), 10–27.
Cameron, R. (2009). A sequential mixed model research design: Design, analytical and display issues. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3(2), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.5172/MRA.3.2.140
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Qomaruna Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Works in this journal are licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International.