Manuscripts submitted to the journal first undergo an initial assessment by our internal team, ensuring their adherence to methodological standards, appropriate formatting, and alignment with the journal's objectives. Using a double-blind peer review system, each article is reviewed by at least two independent peer-reviewers, with additional reviewers consulted if necessary. Feedback from reviewers is shared with the authors. Subsequently, the authors' responses and the initial comments are assessed by the Editor-in-Chief and the Editorial Board. Comprehensive deliberations about the final review process occur during editorial board meetings. The Editor-in-Chief, considering the feedback and the journal's objectives, then determines which articles are selected for publication.